Major Infrastructure and Compulsory Purchase

Published On: July 29th, 2016Categories: News

One of the intentions of the Planning Act 2008 was to make the permitting of major infrastructure projects more straightforward by combing planning consent and the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO)  into the Development Consent Order (DCO).  It is debatable whether or not it has had the desired effect, rather than merely front loading the process to the statutory pre application stages which lie outside of the determination period set for PINS.

Application-process-diagram2

The governments own illustration above sets out the timelines involved in the DCO process, but it doesn’t show that the pre-application process is often between 3 and 5 years.

Either way, on approval the developer will have gained powers to obtain the specific land and rights that are required to carry out the development over land in which they have no existing legal interest.  These developers are not only the large energy companies, authorities and agencies operating in the public good as one might expect, but include numerous private enterprises operating on a purely commercial basis.

We are starting to see more projects coming through the process from those that are high profile, such as HS2, to more local developments such as Wrexham Energy Centre and SPEN’s new 132kV line.

The developer is strongly encouraged by PINS to seek voluntary agreement to acquire land rights early in the DCO process, ideally before the application stage, but for affected landowners the threat of compulsory powers can often confuse their negotiating capacity.

Recent changes to the compulsory purchase rules have been brought in by Part 7 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 and the government is consulting on further reforms, all of which makes the process more complicated than ever before.

Any landowners who are approached as being affected by a major infrastructure project should take expert advice before considering their next steps.  There is often no need to be pushed into a hasty decision given the timeframes over which these projects gestate.

 

Related posts

  • Published On: March 14th, 2022

    February saw the opening of the window for this years Countryside Stewardship (CS) applications and we are urging farmers and landowners to undertake an early review of their options

  • Published On: August 26th, 2021

    Landowners who have sites with development potential should be promoting and preparing planning strategies now so that they are ready to move quickly as planning opportunities arise at a

  • Published On: November 22nd, 2019

    This probably isn't news to anyone in the industry, but development and investment appetite for new large scale solar sites is as strong as ever. With all political leaders

  • Published On: September 4th, 2019

    MHCLG has published a consultation document seeking views on possible amendments to permitted development rights to support deployment of the 5G telecommunications network.  Alongside extended powers granted to operators under the updated Electronic

  • Published On: August 21st, 2019

    Despite pledging the development of HS3, Boris is nervous about the costs and delays of HS2.  This review will certainly not make things happen faster or save any money -

  • Published On: February 27th, 2019

    The revised National Planning Policy Framework was updated on 19th  February 2019 and sets out the Government’s amended planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied.