Which side of the shifts in the General Permitted Development Order should you be on?
With recent changes to Class Q and Class R for agricultural buildings located on agricultural units of more than 5 hectares, it is time to think strategically to ensure you are not missing out.
So what does this all mean?
Under Class R, agricultural buildings of a total area of 1,000 square meters (an increase from 500 square meters) as of April 2024, can be converted into General Industrial, Storage or Distribution, Hotels, Commercial Business or Service or Outdoor Recreation uses.
The extension in the overall development area will enable both those who have already made use of the previous 500m2 on offer to convert additional buildings and new applicants to make use of the full extended floor area, so long as both the building and Holding meet the below criteria.
For Class Q – changing agricultural buildings to residential units, a change was announced in May 2024, with a transition period where both the old and new rules can be used until 21st May 2025, and this is where strategy may come into play.
The ‘old rules’ allow the below development possibilities on buildings constructed before 2013:
- Three ‘large dwellings’ of between 100m2 and 465m2 each,
- Five smaller dwellings of up to 100m2 each – with an overall space limit of 500m2
- A mixture of larger dwellings and 2 smaller dwellings, so long as the overall area for conversion does not exceed the above (smaller dwellings not exceeding 100m2 and larger dwellings not exceeding 465m2). The maximum development space would therefore be 4 small dwellings of up to 400m2 in total, and one larger dwelling of 465m2 leaving a total development area of 865m2 including all first floors and mezzanines.
Under new Rule for Class Q:
A total area of 1,000m2 can be converted into up to 10 dwellings, but the maximum size of each of the dwellings has now been limited to 150m2. This is a reduction in size for large dwellings of 315m2!
Under new rules barns can be extended to the rear by up to 4 meters onto any hard standing which was already in place as of the 24th July 2023 (no extensions were previously permissible). The building must now have been built before 24th July 2023, as part of an established agricultural unit, and therefore far more barns will qualify for the new rules than did previously.
So thinking strategically, do you have barns which meet the old Class Q requirements, and would be of the highest value as larger dwellings? If so your application needs to be in by 21st May 2025, or does the market in your area, and your site better lend itself to 5-10 smaller dwellings? Do you have barns which may now qualify but didn’t previously? In which case the new rules might be better for you.
Once you have decided whether Class R, or either of the Class Q rules might work for you, it is key to understand any tax implications (CGT or IHT), as well as how the asset is owned. Transferring ownership the property prior to obtain planning consent when it is lower value may be strategic, but would it still be considered part of an established agricultural unit?
For further details on building criteria for Class R or Class Q or any further information on any of the above, get in touch.
Related posts
In March the High Court quashed the decision of a planning inspector who had given the green light for the wind turbine on Poplars Farm in Wappenham, South Northamptonshire.
Last Thursday (27th August) DECC launched their much anticipated consultation on reviewing the Feed-in Tarrif (FiT) - and what a bombshell it was. The conservative party had clearly targeted
Today Amber Rudd, the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, seems to have a taken a big step towards dropping the "Climate Change" element of her monicker,
Wilson Fearnall have obtained outline planning permission for residential development on 0.85 acres of development land off Pear Tree Lane in Whitchurch. As agricultural land, the site was given
The Rural Payments service left it until late on Friday night to formally notify registered BPS applicants that the new computer system, designed to streamline the claim submissions process,
The Government has formally committed to an outright ban on fracking in National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) in a
